General Info on UN
I first came across these pieces of information on the UN in 2006, actual written/print dates of the information is earlier than that, in some cases by several years. The links are still good, and you can read the actual articles, from which I have included some excerpts. (As I find more of the information I've found, I'll post it.)
First of all, from www.un-freezone.org/concerns3.html --- "Are you concerned that..." "The UN's aim has always been to take over our educational system?" & "Harmful UN programs are undermining America's educational systerm?"
((which also includes these quotes in the side margin)) - "As long as a the child breathes the poisoned air of nationlism, education in world-mindedness can produce only rather precarious results." -UNESCO-produced pamphlet in the Toward World Understanding series /&/ "The people who have taught us to believe whatever they were told by their parents or their teachers are the people who are the menace to the world." -Dr. G. Brook Chisholm, former Director General of the UN's WHO
Second, look at www.rense.com/general6/ussenategives.htm titled, US Senate Gives UN Control over 70% of World's Land Mass. It talks about the Desertification Treaty. This was passed in October 2000, by being compiled with about 34 other treaties (single issue & w/single country), without knowledge of the Senators. (So the NOT reading through what they are voting on is definitely not new.) And, an important note: there is no distinction between federally owned or privately owned land!
Some more quotes from www.un-freezone.org/concerns2.html ...RE: environment - "Does...the Wildlands Project advocate the end of industrial civilization? Most assuredly. Everything civilized must go." -Editor John davis in the UN Wildlands Project's journal, Wild Earth /&/ "The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans." -Wildlands Project Co-architect Reed Noss /&/ "Humanity must undergo a radical change in its attitudes, values, and behavior...a new global ethics is taking form, and it is finding expression in international law." -International Union for the Conservation of Nature's Earth Ethics magazine (Spring 1996)
Thirdly, from www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread45831/pg1 talks about that the US National Parks. This person came across a program that was saying that the US was being sold out by the government...to the United Nations and China...that the US National Parks have been used as collateral. This person then continues on to share other information and links that they came across while looking into this.
Lastly, look at www.crossroad.to/text/articles/Food-Land96.html. Here are a few more quotes and some excerpts from this 'article'. "At the World Food Programme we have recognized what a valuable tool food aid can be in changing behaviour. In so many poorer countries food is money, food is power. ...Yes, it's bribery. We don't apologize for that. We are changing behaviour, we are giving hope and opportunity to young girls -and that's all that counts." -Catherine Bertinit, Executive Director of the World Food Program. /&/ "We, in the green movement, aspire to a cultural model in which killing a forest will be considered more contemptible and more criminal than the sale of 6-year-old children to Asian brothels." -Carl Amery, German Greens /&/ "If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." -Prince Philip of Great Britain, leader of World Wildlife Fund ((which brings up this thought, have you ever read anything/any of the Global 2000 or Global 2000 Revisited reports - concerning the problem of over population? Global 2000 is a report that was given to President Jimmy Carter.))
Now some excerpts: A "healthy Great Plains would encompass every square meter of the Plains, from the prarie provinces of Canada through Oklahoma and Texas," added Glen Martin who wrote the TWA article. It would include Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, and the Dakotas as well as the "adjacent ecosystems, such as the boreal forests of northern Michigan and Minnesota and aspen groves of the eastern slopes of the Rockies. ..." /// According to UN guidelines, all people and all places would be monitored- schools, homes, workplaces... All who violate the new standards for tolerance, gender equity, or sustainable living at home or at work would be tracked through the vast UN-controlled data system. Globalist leaders know that only a new set of beliefs and values will prepare the Western world to accest what Al Gore calls "sacrifice, struggle and a wrenching transformation of society." /// "Improve the dissemination and utilization of information and data needed to guide and monitor progress" states the contract (#59c) The validity of new data matters less than its power to stir feelings and motivate the masses to accept the new socialist criteria for economic equality. As Stanford University environmentalist Stephen Schneider said, "we need to get some broad based support. ' we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts we might have..." /// "To rally support, advocacy must outweigh integrity. Last April a public health agency told its employees to dispose of any data that contradicted politically correct policies and conclussions..." /// What counts is the apperance of consensus-the key to managing people through "civic government. ... This strategy, which uses planned dialogues and politically correct data to create a collective mindset ... In fact, the worldwide "human resource" management system envisioned by socialist leaders decades ago is almost in place. ///
Does any of this sound familiar?
Also excerpts from www.crossroad.to/text/articles/Food-Land96.html
The "agreements" are a two-part contract: ...Under the noble banner of "civic government", it links local and international NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) directly to UN agencies, bypassing Congress and state legislatures that cling to old notions of sovereignty. /// The Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA) suggest an answer: simply cut the world population by about 80% or return to a feudal lifestyle (no cars, planes, air conditioners) ... the GBA estimates that, an 'agricultural world' in which most human beings are peasants, should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people...In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American standard of living would be 1 billion [people].
(this comment is reminiscent of the Global 2000 report from the late 70s that was given to President Carter.)
